Common Law Relationships and Property Division in Barrie, Ontario

divorced couple tearing moneySo, you lived together in a common law relationship but now it has come to an end. Your friends say "When you separate, it's just the same as if you had been married. Everything is 50/50!"

This is an urban myth. In Ontario, it is more complicated. 

Of course, the starting point is that you keep the assets and debts in your name and your partner keeps the assets and debt in their name. The question is whether either of you have to share the value of your assets with the other. 

A recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) known as Kerr v. Baranow, radically changed how we look at the rights of common law partners upon separation regarding property division.

The SCC has now said that if there is a “joint family venture” there should be a fair division of the assets acquired during the relationship.

In lower court decisions since the SCC decision, if there is long term relationship, especially with children, and there has been an joint effort to work together for the betterment of both parties and an intermingling of the finances, there tends to be an equal division of the assets acquired during the relationship.

Although we don't have many cases decided since the decision at time of writing this blog, I think we will see a trend toward an equal division of property upon separation when the parties have been living together in long, stable relationship, especially if there are children, the parties have intentionally became financially intertwined and they worked collaboratively toward mutual goals. 

If you have lived together for a short period of time and you kept your finances and financial goals separate, you might not have a right to a share in any of your partner's assets at all. It may be that each party just keeps that which is in their own name and that jointly owned property is shared equally. 

Of course, your case may be in between the two extremes. You might have a right to some of your partner's assets.  It all depends on on the facts of your relationship whether you have a claim and the extent of your claim. 

Of course, another issue is spousal support. If you have lived together for more than 3 years or you have a child together and your incomes are different you may have a right to spousal support. Check out this article for more information. 

You are wise to seek the advice of a family law lawyer, just to get an idea whether you might have a claim to your partner's property when it is a common law relationship. It's murky water. 

 

Pre-Nuptial Agreement for Archie and Veronica?

Comic book chPre Nup Agreement with contract and pen visiblearacters Archie and Veronica are getting married. In the article, "Do Archie and Veronica Need a Prenup," by Globe and Mail writer, Roma Luciw, she poses the question, "Will they get a prenuptial agreement?"

It's a good question.

A pre-nuptial agreement (also called a marriage contract or a cohabitation agreement) states what will happen should the couple separate. It settles issue such as the division of property in advance of any issues arising and often in a way that is different than a judge would do.

Veronica is the more wealthy of the two so she would be wise to have an agreement in place. In my opinion, family law in Ontario is unfair because if Veronica owns a home on the day of marriage that she and Archie move into as their "matrimonial home" and then they separate, Veronica will have to share the entire value with Archie. It won't matter that she had, for example, $100,000 of equity built up in the home when they got married. She has to share the whole value of the home with Archie. This is not the case with other assets, just the matrimonial home. I have never thought that was fair.

I can imagine that Veronica's father may be very skeptical of Archie's motives. He may accuse Archie of being a  "gold digger". For that reason, Archie may want to have a pre-nuptial put in place just to show that he is marrying Veronica because he loves her (and not just her money).

Pre-nuptial agreements are useful if you want to protect a particular assets such as a family business, or you own a home that you and your beloved intend to occupy. Sometimes older couples who marry get pressure from their adult children to enter into an agreement so they won't lose their "inheritance" to the new partner if Gramma and Grampa separate.

A co-habitation agreement is a good idea if you are planning on living together instead of marrying. Common law separations can be complicated since the law is so ambiguous as to the rights of each person upon a separation. An agreement in advance (when you both still love each other) is a good idea so you both know what will happen should you separate.

By the way... Luciw reports that the creators of Archie say there will be no pre-nuptial agreement. I guess everyone is just hoping Archie and Veronica live happily ever after.

I've heard that one before!