New Pension Legislation in Ontario Effective January 1, 2012

image of money being split in halfMatthew Krofchuk has written a excellent blog at Divorce Happens Blog regarding the changes to the pension division legislation in Ontario which came into affect January 1, 2012. Matthew is with Krofchick Valuation so knows his stuff. 

The biggest impact of the new legislation is that you can now divided Ontario pensions at source if you want. So, let's say you have a pension worth $60,000. In the past, you would have to give your spouse $30,000 to equalize the value of this asset if all other assets and debts were equal. Now, you can arrange to have your pension plan transfer to your spouse $30,000 into a locked in savings vehicle (LIRA). 

Here is Matthew's blog... it explains it well.... 

Beginning January 1, 2012 new legislation passed by the Ontario legislature will result in a dramatic change in the way pension assets are divided between divorcing couples in Ontario. According to the Ontario Family Law Act (FLA), the value of married spouses’ pension assets must be included in family property, so the new pension rules could potentially affect a large number of married people in Ontario.

Are you one of them?

Well, for starters, the new rules – formally known as Bill 133 – only apply to spouses where no court order, family arbitration award, or domestic contract that provided for the division of pension assets between the two spouses was made before January 1, 2012. If you’ve entered into any one of these arrangements before the end of 2011, you’ll have to stick it out under the old rules.

The new rules also affect only those pensions covered by the Ontario Pension and Benefits Act, or in other words, provincial pensions. So if you or your spouse is a member of a pension plan that operates at a nationwide level like those available to federal public service employees or banks, for example, the value of the marital pension will be calculated in exactly the same way it was before. Provincial plans, however – like HOOPP, OMERS, and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan – will be directly affected by the new rules and there will be a number of changes divorcing spouses with pensions like these should be aware of.

The first major change involves just who’s calculating the value of the pension. Pensions are currently valued by third party actuaries retained either by one (or both) of the divorcing spouses or their lawyers. The new rules, however, no longer give divorcing couples this option. Beginning in 2012 divorcing spouses will have to apply directly to the pension plan administrator to calculate the value of the pension to be divided as net family property. You will need to appeal to them directly by filling out a form from the Financial Services Commission of Ontario’s (FSCO) website and they will likely charge a fee for their services.

The new rules also allow divorcing spouses to transfer the value of the member spouse’s pension in the form of a lump sum payment if they desire; this option was not available under the old rules. Previously, the only way that a spouse could receive their portion of their partner’s pension was either as a percentage of monthly pension benefits, when they became payable, or indirectly through negotiating their settlement (kind of a, “you get the house and I’ll keep my pension” arrangement). It’s important to know that this new lump sum option is just that: an option. Spouses can still elect to go at it the old fashioned way if they desire.

The last big change involves how the value of the pension is calculated. As they relate to pension valuation the new rules don’t contain any provisions that require the spouses to do anything over and above what they already do; you still have to get that pension valued. However, the pension administrators – now the folks in charge of calculating the value of these pensions – will not be applying traditional actuarial practices in valuing them. The new rules mandate that all pension valuations be performed using a prescribed formula that should apply to all pensions.

This last change appears to result from an effort by the province to minimize conflict and lengthy court proceedings. By setting out a simple formula for the administrators there’s very little room for either party to argue or to revisit the calculation at some later date in light of a change in circumstances, both of which were not uncommon under the old rules. The downside to this approach, however, is that not all pensions are created equal (and certainly, not all divorcing couples are either). The new rules don’t make any provisions for the kinds of unique circumstances that could impact the value of pensions – like retirement ages or health issues – but unless the Courts decide that these issues should be taken into account as they arise, we’re probably stuck with them for the time being.

By Matthew Krofchick

Division and Equalization of Property in Barrie Ontario

Property Division in OntarioThe division of property after separation raises many questions: How is it divided? Do we have to sell the house? Do I have to share my pension? What about my inheritance? 

The uncertainty leads to many sleepless nights. Everyone fears they will end up with nothing. The classic country song by Jerry Reid comes to mind for many: "She Got the Gold Mine, I Got the Shaft".(Women may insert "He" instead of "She" in the title and lyrics. The fear is the same for both genders.)

In Ontario, some of the uncertainty is eliminated by the Family Law Act which describes a formula so both you and your spouse end up with about the same net property. It looks like this:

+ Add up your assets on the date of separation

- Subtract your debts on the date of separation

Subtract any gifts from third parties, inheritances or proceeds from a personal injury claim received during the marriage which were kept separate and are still in existence on the date of separation

Subtract your assets less any debt you had on the date of marriage.

The resulting number is called your Net Family Property (NFP). Your spouse does the same calculation.

÷ 2  If your NFP number is higher than your spouse’s NFP number, you owe half the difference so as to make the NFP's equal.

Here is an example:

ASSETS ON DATE OF SEPARATION HUSBAND WIFE
Home (Jointly Owned) worth $240,000 $120,000 $120,000
Cars (Fair Market Value) $20,000 $12,000
Pensions $60,000 NIL
RRSP (deduct 25% for taxes) $10,000 $45,000
Snowmobiles (Fair Market Value) $5,000 NIL
Total A $215,000 $177,000
     
DEBTS ON DATE OF SEPARATION HUSBAND WIFE
Mortgage $80,000 $80,000
Visa $10,000 $7,000
Car Loan $8,000 NIL
Total B $98,000 $87,000
     
GIFTS, INHERITANCES, PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS HUSBAND WIFE
Snowmobile - Gift From Parents $5000 NIL
Total C    
ASSETS LESS DEBT ON DATE OF MARRIAGE HUSBAND WIFE
Pension $15,000 NIL
RRSP NIL $5,000
Car $3,000 $4,000
Car Loan NIL ($2,000)
Total D $18,000 $7,000

To Summarize:

  HUSBAND WIFE
Total A (Assets) $215,000 $177,000
Minus Total B (Debt) ($98,000) ($87,000)
Minus Total C (Gifts, Etc) ($5,000) NIL
Minus Total D (D of M) ($18,000) ($7,000)
Net Family Property $94,000 $83,000

DIFFERENCE $94,000 - $83,000 = $11,000

EQUALIZATION OWED BY HUSBAND TO WIFE IS $5,500.00!

Once the Husband pays the Wife $5,500.00, each will have $88,500.

The Home: In this example, the home is jointly owned. If the Husband wants to purchase the Wife’s interest in the home, he would have to pay his Wife the equalization of $5,500 plus pay her for her one half interest in the home. This is calculated as $120,000 minus the mortgage of $80,000 equals $40,000. So, the Husband would have to pay the Wife $40,000 plus $5,500 for a total of $45,500. The Husband would then own the house solely and paid out his Wife. Alternatively, the house could be sold and sale proceeds divided or the Wife could buy out the Husband's interest. 

Ownership: You and your spouse keep the assets and debts in your own names. So, all we deal with in Ontario is the value of the various assets and debts. You don't have an ownership interest in your spouse's pension or other assets. Just a potential right to an equalization payment if they have more stuff (a larger NFP number) than you. 

Household Contents: If you want help dividing up the furniture and other items in the home, here is a blog about it. 

Adjustments: You may wish to to adjust the assets or debts so as to equalize the NFP numbers and avoid an equalization payment. So, in this example, the Husband might give his Wife some of his assets or take on some of her debt so there is no equalization payment owed. 

Excluded Property: An inheritance, a gift from a third party or a payment for a personal injury which is received during the marriage is not shared. If it was used to pay joint debts or invested into a jointly owned asset or is spent, it cannot be deducted. 

Equalization of property in Ontario

Debts: I often hear complaints from clients about having to take into consideration debts incurred by their spouse without their consent or knowledge. It is very frustrating. The law says that the reason debts were incurred does not matter except if it was for an illegal purpose. Your debts (meaning the ones in your name) are yours and your spouse’s debts remain your spouse’s debts, and jointly owed debts are shared. But everything is balanced out by the equalization process. If you have more debts than your spouse, your spouse may have to make an equalization payment to balance everything out.

Whole Picture: Some clients get confused because they want to equalize each asset or each debt one at a time. You have to look at the whole picture, using the formula above, and not look at individual assets or debts.

Unequal Equalizations: In rare cases, it is possible to ask for an “unequal equalization” if ordering an equalization payment according to the normal formula would be “unconscionable”. Our lawyers can help you determine if your case would be an exception to the general rule.

We have seen many people get the equalization calculation wrong, including other lawyers. Our lawyers only do family law and work with equalization calculations every day. We can help you get it right.

Case Study: If you are interested in reading how a typical case is resolved, read this article. 

Personal Insights: When I went through my own divorce (yes, divorce lawyers can get divorced... just like doctors can get sick), I learned some personal lessons. Here they are.

Perhaps Jerry Reid wasn't living in Ontario when he wrote the lyrics to his famous and hilarious song: 

Well, she got the gold mine!
I got the shaft.
They split it all down the middle,
And then they give her the better half.
Well, I guess it all sounds funny,
Hoo, hoo, hoo, ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
But it hurts too much to laugh.
She got the gold mine - I got the sha-a-aft.

... or maybe he just retained the wrong law firm!